What if we called all heterosexual people, non-queer?

Words have impact, and othering a group often starts with the way we use language.

While it may seem like a simple solution, calling all heterosexual people "non-queer" could potentially have negative implications. First and foremost, it would be reductive to define people solely by their sexual orientation, as individuals are much more than their sexual identity.

​

Moreover, using a term like "non-queer" could be seen as divisive and exclusionary, as it implies that queer individuals are separate from and not part of the larger societal group. This goes against the goal of creating a more inclusive and accepting society.

​

Additionally, it is important to recognize that language and its impact can vary depending on the cultural and social context. In some communities, the term "queer" has been reclaimed as a positive and empowering label, while in others it may still carry negative connotations.

​

Instead of using labels that can create division, it is important to focus on creating a culture of acceptance and inclusivity for all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. This can be done through education, advocacy, and creating safe spaces for all individuals to express themselves freely.