Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

269
Swiss court case ties human rights to climate change
Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

Not sure what kind of narratives you talk about. I have never come across such statements. Perhaps, you could consult the reports of the IPCC. Those are serious and based on facts.

When you need a surgery, you consult your doctor, don‘t you? Or are you also questioning a specialist in such a case as well? Doing your surgeries yourself, eh?
Be advised that these people devoted their lives to understand what they are dealing with. I assume that you didn‘t study much climatology, earth system sciences or physical geography. How can you think that you are competent enough to question what the great majority of experts in the world agrees with? I asked you about your kniwledge on the climate. You gave me some uncertain and dubious references to some snow on a japanese mountain. You did not mention a single fact which shows me that you have no knowledge on climate whatsoever. This just shows me that you are blabbering, but not thinking and not researching anything. If you were serious about your criticism, you would have researched your topic a little and mentioned things such as the carbon cycle and the greenhouse effect, the composition of the atmosphere, some basic physics and some statistics. What I can tell you for a fact, is that I grew up next to glaciers in Switzerland, I saw them retreat immensly, and in the context of my studies I also did field measurements on a glacier. I saw the glacier tongue melting away at an insane rate (more than 0.5m in 2 weeks), and that in mid September, not mid-summer (June or July). In the context of droughts, in a few years there will be no more water security in summer even in Switzerland during summers. That trend is also visible and statistically relevant.

So, all in all, you just complained without having any substance to your arguement. Classic statueated example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

[not loaded or deleted]

Question to you: how mich dobyou know about climate change?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
5 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,771,947
Link Karma
1,653,071
Comment Karma
113,914
Profile updated: 1 day ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago