This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
From Chapter 5 of The Death and Life of Great American Cities:
Cities are full of generalized parks that can hardly be expected
to justify themselves, even if their districts are successfully enlivened.
This is because some parks are basically unfitted, whether
by location, size or shape, to serve successfully in the publicyard
fashion I have been discussing. Nor are they fitted by size
or inherent variety of scene to become major metropolitan parks.
What can be done with them?
Some of these, if sufficiently small, can do another job well:
simply pleasing the eye. San Francisco is good at this. A tiny
triangular street intersection leftover, which in most cities would
either be flattened into asphalt or else have a hedge, a few benches
and be a dusty nonentity, in San Francisco is a fenced miniature
world of its own, a deep, cool world of water and exotic forest,
populated by the birds that have been attracted. You cannot go
in yourself. You do not need to, because your eyes go in and take
you farther into this world than feet could ever go.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 year ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/urbandesign...