Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

4
Unraid XFS with 1 parity disk vs RAID1 performance?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I've got a QNAP TS-462 with 16 GB RAM that's been behaving poorly with recent QTS updates. I'm backing up everything to external disks now to redeploy it, and have brand new 2x 8 TB disks to start fresh but now I've got the option to stick with QTS and deploy fresh, or switch to UnRaid.

UnRaid is looking really appealing, but the one thing I'm wondering about is read speeds, and whether or not it might be an issue. My NAS is mostly archival, I copy things back and forth periodically, but most of it is reads, not writes. That's great with the mirroring of RAID1 to my understanding, and I know it will be slower with UnRaid. But I'm wondering how much slower, and if a nvme cache disk will be enough to mitigate potential issues.

My network is only 1GBit. My router is capable of 2.5Gbit but I don't currently have devices that could take advantage of that except the NAS. Would the reduction in read speed since the disks aren't mirrored be an issue? Is the pool with parity something akin to how RAID5 works? I'm pretty new to this, have been researching the last week or two, but haven't been able to find clear answers regarding the performance so figured I'd ask here.

Thanks!

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
14 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
92,916
Link Karma
14,210
Comment Karma
77,632
Profile updated: 1 week ago
Posts updated: 1 month ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 months ago