If you're from UP Law and not even THAT can help you get laid, bro... THAT'S JUST FUCKING SAD. I told you POLITELY, that it's not about you not having a car, but since you're a gaslighter and you thought I was being rude to you, I'd level with your pettiness...

Let me be blunt: You're not getting laid not because you have no car, IT'S BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO GAME.

AND NOT EVEN YOUR SCHOOL, NOR YOUR DEGREE CAN GET YOU LAID.

Now, I believe that I was being too kind earlier.

I told you to look outwards and just consider that people might just be ashamed of being seen in public with a person whom they're not in a relationship with, rather than look inwards, and blame yourself and think that having a car matters that much.

Casual sex, though rampant, still and will always involve shame and disgust. Because the reality of it is, YOU NAIVE FUCK, NOT EVERYONE IS OPEN TO IT.

People still find it shameful to walk in and out of hotels/motels EVEN WITH MASKS ON (yes, it's not an invisibility cloak), because people aren't with those whom they have relationships with. Since hook ups have the absence of lovey-dovey stuff, people know you're just there for the sex, and not to spend quality time together.

That's why some girls prefer guys with cars, not because they're generally elitist (which came from you, and you just want me to confirm it), it's because they're avoiding the "walk of shame".

Which is either:

"Being seen in a place where people get to fuck."

Or

"Being seen coming out and going home after you've been fucked."

The disgust comes from people who think you're a floozy, and surprisingly, from within yourself. That's if and when you think engaging in casual sex would make you "different", in a negative light.

This is why people usually take long showers or baths after they've arrived home post-hook up.

Eitherway, having a car avoids that awkwardness. Those judgmental stares, those piercing looks towards you and the person you'd hook up with.

This avoids having to explain who you're with, especially when you pass by the concierge or the front desk of a hotel, condo, or resort.

You could always use the parking elevator.

And your proud ass thinks it's not related to the "act itself".

Aren't you aware that anxiety affects libido?

Anxiety, shame, disgust, and even guilt decreases libido.

Guys and girls who are anxious, ashamed, digusted, and guilty find it difficult to get horny.

Do you think someone would still have sex with you if you've put them in an uncomfortable situation?

You'd scare or shame that pussy shut.

NOT EVERYONE CAN GO AROUND PARADING THAT THEY SLEEP AROUND.

NOT EVERYONE HAS THE CONFIDENCE TO WALTZ INTO A PLACE WITH SOMEONE WHOM THEY JUST MET AND THEY'D OBVIOUSLY FUCK AND NOT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT WHAT ANYBODY THINKS.

NOT EVERYONE OWNS UP TO HOOKING UP.

And the term "inherently wrong" in related to something "sinful" which is as we know is religious in nature, correct? Or am I wrong? That came from you. But shame and disgust are both unrelated to religion, it's about the psyche, and what I've been saying.

The mention of premarital sex and immorality, are more religion-leaning, yes. But the term "inherently wrong" came from you.

You misinterpreted that the term 'okay' was about something acceptable which is either right or wrong about wanting something more than what's in front of you.

I was using the term 'okay' about being open to having casual sex within your circle of friends. I suggested to find one within your circle, since apparently you want a hook up, but like what I've been trying to tell you, there is such a shame and disgust when it comes to casual sex, especially if you haphazardly picked a partner within your circle.

Shame comes in from people commenting, "why did you have to sleep with one of our friends?"

Disgust comes in when someone says, "why did you have sex with that particular person?"

The lack of tact, is what's shameful and disgusting about it especially if your circle of friends have set that particular boundary not to be crossed.

Sidebar: It's NOT the sex with a friend that's shameful and disgusting. It's CROSSING THE BOUNDARY that makes it shameful and disgusting. It's disrespect towards your friends, and the relationship have with each and every one of them.

And you think I was pertaining to the idea of your choice going beyond your circle of friends is something "inherently wrong".

You totally misunderstood my point.

Having casual sex is more 'taboo' based on religion rather than the law (unless you're married) and in a generally Catholic country like ours, promiscuity is frowned upon... which would bring up shame and disgust, either to oneself or others, right?

And again, whether your fucking friends are open-minded or not, the fact that you can't just simply ask one of them to hook up, means that they do not condone it. You can't just fuck a friend like a lifeline. That's why it's not 'okay'.

Hell, you're in a "progressive tertiary educ community", right? And you can't even get laid? In a progressive community?

You brag about belonging to UP, I am from UP too, you stupid fuck.

And you dare to insult the institution I belong to by bragging how "progressive and not traditional (I sincerely think the correct term is nontraditional)" yours is, as if mine wasn't, which ironically is the same institution you belong to.

But your naiveté and your pride, even if you've indirectly admitted that you lack the knowledge on how to "hook up", still made you think you're better than I am? Just because you didn't have the experience, (well, the EQ too) to understand my point, that doesn't mean I have problems communicating, you just really have no idea of what you're getting yourself into. You have no fucking idea and you're deflecting towards me.

I was being nice, and you thought I didn't understand you. LOL.

So, now, my question is simple... if even dumbasses get laid-- why can't you?

You might be in law school, but I think you didn't know that you shouldn't challenge anyone without knowing the facts first. That's how you lose a case. But then again, you're probably the type who would just settle and call it "a win".