This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Keep in mind that being muscular TAKES EFFORT AND TIME, of course being slightly more muscular it's better in most cases but i think for short kings being muscular won't do much for your attractiveness, it could give you a little boost but the effort required to build an athletic body it's not worth for short people assuming they're doing it for the looks.
I would say that it can even be detrimental since being too muscular can make you look bulky therefore shorter, stubbier, i think they'll do better going for the very slim/pretty boy aesthetic instead of manly dominant male. What do you think?.
EDIT: im seeing lots of replies with generally agreed things like "muscles are not for getting laid" and "muscular>fat" and confidence and stuff like that. Yeah, we get it.. but this sub is for discussing mostly aesthetic and superficial shit, so please, stay on topic
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 month ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/trueratedis...
Danny Devito still probably getting more action than all of us.