Would a 74W-62L-47D record in five-plus years in MLS be considered an average or above average tally for a coach? How about if spending at the club was above average in comparison with other MLS teams?

According to Chat GPT:

A record of 74 wins, 62 losses, and 47 draws in five-plus years in MLS can generally be considered above average, especially if the team's spending on players and resources is also above average compared to other MLS teams. Here's why:

1. Wins: 74 wins over five years averages out to roughly 14-15 wins per season, which is a solid performance. Most MLS coaches aim to win around one-third of their games in a season, so this is above that benchmark.

2. Losses: 62 losses over the same period indicate a relatively low number of defeats, further emphasizing the coach's ability to avoid losing matches consistently.

3. Draws: 47 draws are reasonable and show that the team is competitive, often earning points even in matches that don't result in wins.

If the club is spending more on player salaries, transfers, and facilities than the average MLS team, it suggests that the coach has access to better resources, which can positively impact performance. This would make the record more impressive, as higher spending often correlates with higher expectations and a more competitive roster.

However, it's essential to consider the specific context and expectations of the club and its ownership when evaluating a coach's performance. While this record is generally above average, individual circumstances and goals can influence whether it's considered a success or not.

Apparently ChatGPT thinks Gio did alright