Maintenance - We're currently working on things and you might experience some issues. Should be wrapped up soon!

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

5
[REQUEST] What percentage of online porn videos have titles/labels/tags indicating teenage content?
Author Summary
Cornwaller64 is in request
Post Body

Please bear with this one, it's incredibly important to me - for obvious reasons.

I fell afoul of authorities in the UK over a charge of sexual misconduct of which I was completely innocent.

Much simplified, in a nutshell ~ unbeknownst to me, a girl I knew F[17] developed a crush on me M[54] while actively dating her boyfriend M[20ish] and one day cheated on him with a third-party.

She covered-up by claiming she was platonically visiting with me at the time (as she occasionally was known to do), but this tactic blew-up in her face, ending with her mother accusing me of satutory rape (furtherly unbeknownst to either she or myself, this girl had been classified as 'a vulnerable individual' as a pre-teen, making any accusation of sexuality between she and I automatically viewed as stat. rape ~ even though normal age of consent is 16 here.).

C.I.D. became involved and in her sworn statement, under threat from & in the presence of her mother (who never liked me, because in times past I'd spurned her own advances), the girl described all of her experiences with this third party as if these we between she & I.

Nevertheless, while C.I.D utterly refused to believe anything I or my few witnesses had to say, C.P.S couldn't & wouldn't progress any of several creative & varied criminal charges with which they attempted to arraign me. Thank the gods.

In the end, police were reduced to resorting to a civil prosecution, which was 'supposedly proven' in Magistrates' Court on the *sole basis* that my recorded porn viewing history indicated that I was 'preferentially searching out teen-related porn' and that therefore I would be a likely clear & present danger to 'underage persons of either (!) gender' - hence that charge, which prevents me being in any association with under-18s, privately/publicly, without police consent on an individual case basis.

I was unable to make my solicitor understand &/or argue my case that a very high proportion of all porn videos *are* always going to be associated with 'teen-related content' tagging, simply because there seemed to be no research results on the subject available.

*This QUEST is to respectfully request assistance in securing such information as would be helpful in demonstrating all random selections of non-niche porn videos cannot but show high percentages of teen-related content titles, labels & tags.*

I shall seek quashing of this heinous charge, once I can show this supporting data.

Please and thankyou.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
8,113
Link Karma
170
Comment Karma
4,648
Profile updated: 4 days ago
Posts updated: 11 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 years ago