Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Why don’t more saas products use a minimum seat pricing model instead of per-user pricing?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I saw a product that provides 2 or 4 seats based on the plan, and the price doesn't seem to change with additional seats.

This makes sense because it keeps pricing simple. Many SaaS tools charge per user, which works well for products like Slack or Notion where value grows with team size. But for tools like Canva or ChatGPT, a single account can be shared without losing functionality, making per-user pricing less relevant.

A minimum seat model feels more practical in those cases. It guarantees baseline revenue and avoids users gaming the system by sharing accounts. But why is it so rare?

I think it’s because per-user pricing feels scalable and familiar. It’s easy for companies to justify and optimize revenue as teams grow. A flat-rate model, on the other hand, might limit upsell potential unless users actively upgrade tiers.

Curious to hear what others think — is it time for more SaaS products to move away from strict per-user pricing?

(Used ChatGPT to write faster but it is a genuine question 😵‍💫)

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
2,606
Link Karma
1,080
Comment Karma
1,526
Profile updated: 4 days ago
Posts updated: 6 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 weeks ago