This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I came across this article, written by a Cambridge-educated scientist who started an organisation, "Science On Trial", that aims to "elevate scientific standards within the criminal justice system".
She wrote some commentary on the immunoessay tests which were used to secure Letby's first two convictions, and explained why the defence (in her view, wrongly) didn't contest these in court.
I thought it might shed some light on the questions asked in the other thread.
I am gonna warn: I will unfortunately have to block people if it seems like they're attacking me for posting this, without reading the article. Or people who falsely accuse me of being a "conspiracy theorist". Very happy for people to critique/disagree, but I'm not happy to be straw-manned.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 3 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- scienceontrial.com/post/...