As title implies, a great many anecdotal reports I'm reading praising 'SR-I7Oseventy4 4 (still legal in some countries, hence writing it in a silly but understandable to those who know way) but, at least all I've read, they either lack context on the duration/ frequency of prior addiction(s), or haven't seen it through? Or the ones that have but give no context on how long they were addicted and to what prior to.

Maybe I'm missing some.

Furthermore, just so these anecdotal reports could be made less anecdotal, there's a lab in Spain that accepts WW samples for UPLC-QToF testing. Anything already in the system, i.e nothing already known to the system, well then testing only serves to help keep folks alive.

Other reason I suggest independently verifying your wares is because the majority of reports suggest Isopyne and Protopyne are not H20 soluble, however this simply isn't true. The lab came back as a Major for Isotonitazepyne; with no other Majors, Minors, active or inactive compounds present. (See my previous post or 3 for those results.)

This leads me to suspect, at least in a percentage of the reports that no 2 people are necessarily talking about the same thing, let alone what they may think they're individually talking about! It would help from both a personal safety and public safety point of view to send a sample to a lab. No matter where you are, there is at least 1 in Spain that accepts 🐌mail WW samples, anonymously.

R.E Iso and Proto, it could be varying batches, if the synthesis differs. Could be bulking agents, or even intentionally mixed/ made with something hydrophobic, perhaps to dissuade IV use. Whose to say. Also in the absence of an independent lab test, might just not be what the individuals believe it to be.

Some may say it's not realistic to test, but the way I figure it; Isopyne, in this SWIMS :p case, 0002 - 0024 of a singular 1000 parts (of 1mg) was = 110mg of Methadone. So the savings that folks are making, leaves a little to spare to get the wares tested, at least in some cases. Yet I can't see many results at all, just some speaking like gods on subjects that they may well be, just anyone who claims to take hundreds of milligrams of Isopyne - I have tremendous doubts that A - it's not heavily cut, B - not what they believe it is. Basing this on 0002 - 0022 out of a 1000 parts 1mg being equivalent to 110 mg of Methadone. At least in this swims experience, and this SWIM did get it independently tested. FYI context, 10 years on Opis; h to morphine, back to #3, then to beautiful #4, to Fent, and to Benzimidazole Opis.

P.S my question pertained to any long time opi user using SR, and exactly how much their tolerance reduced? Be it going from RC's to Morphine, etc or even stopping entirely? Just read a bunch of praise but not someone whose been a long time user and gone from say hypothetically a 100 mg equivalent of Methadone' tolerance to say sub 30mg equivalent etc, or whatever it may be. (I'm using the equivalency just because by comparing to something pharmaceutical grade then it gives us a better idea of how great a reduction, with purity lacking in the absence of a lab test. However, it really is imperative to know the Opi history too, because if it's someone who's been using for 2 months, and they thought they needed something to lessen the withdrawal, well, all I can say is it took me 6 - 12 months to develop any kind of withdrawals whatsoever. Anyway, I'll keep looking through the posts but advocate #labtesting and curious for #sucsessstories for long-term Opi users coming off or greatly reducing their tolerances?

Thanks a bunch and happy new year all!