Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

7
I'm messing with signal to noise ratio to improve accuracy. Anyone else have experience with this?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I'm a physicist. I've been doing "blind reads" by letting my friends write questions on pieces of paper, folding them, and putting them all in a jar. I pull one out at a time, close my eyes, focus on it without opening it or reading it, and write down the mental images that I get. I notice they are often shockingly relevant to whatever is written on the paper, but I have yet to determine whether they provide useful insight or if they're more a reflection of what's on the person's mind who wrote the question. I notice that mental images flow faster when I have a candle as the main light source. I think it's the flickering of the flame introducing more visual noise into the signal to noise ratio. I just read in the book "Entangled Minds" by Dr. Dean Radin that this finding is research supported as well.

Just curious if any of you guys are having any similar experiences you'd be willing to share.

Crystal balls and tea leaves and stuff might be sources of visual noise also, that make it easer for a person to mentally picture whatever unknown thing they are trying to tune into. The noise might even trigger mental pictures.

Author
Account Strength
70%
Account Age
1 year
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
7,703
Link Karma
347
Comment Karma
7,356
Profile updated: 3 days ago
Posts updated: 10 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
11 months ago