This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
1,780
Following the same logic as used for gun 'safety' we should probably re-enact prohibition to save us from ourselves...
Post Details
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not
always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare
these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
- Posted
- 4 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- i.redd.it/ihxezyx6pk941....
Okay we have two things here.
A. is a gun. Its designed to shoot and have good times. It doesn't kick much. If you shoot enough of it you'll have a good time but you'll be useless doing anything else and are a liability to do anything other than clean the action.
B. Is a complicated drink. It’s designed to knock out animals ranging from Bunnies to Bears to Humans. Originally designed by monks who would go through extensive amounts with multiple test batches to ensure that it isn't fermented incorrectly as it's a very complicated procedure that causes liver cell death every time you use it.
Based on these differences it is reasonable that invention B is held under stricter laws than invention A.
Direct comparison between the two of them proves my point I think