This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Community member Yung Beef put forward a proposal to block the Integritee project from progressing with their crowdloan. On-chain governance gives us the ability as community members to put forward proposals and given that parachains go through a quality filter via crowdloans, many have argued that Integritee has been dishonest in their approach to the crowdloans and that they should be blocked. Kusama has the ability to self-modify and we are seeing the first decentralised governance in action.
Yung Beef's summary:https://app.subsocial.network/4779/protecting-the-community-and-letting-them-speak-21168
It's already gone past the proposal stage to the referenda stage and has one day left for the vote.
I think it's interesting to see organic governance emerging from the chaos of the ecosystem. Since it's a public generated vote it needs a greater majority of aye votes to pass, at lower turnouts. The vote falls under a "Super-Majority Approve' metric.
From the Polkadot wiki:
Super-Majority Approve​
A positive turnout bias*, whereby a heavy super-majority of aye votes is required to carry at low turnouts, but as turnout increases towards 100%, it becomes a simple majority-carries as below.*
https://wiki.polkadot.network/docs/learn-governance
Link to Referendum 150 on Polkassembly:
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 3 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/polkadot_ma...