Can someone tell my why my argument for supporting Ron Paul despite some of his more radical ideas i...

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

Can someone tell my why my argument for supporting Ron Paul despite some of his more radical ideas isn't valid?

Post Body

If Ron Paul is elected president, he will have power over the executive branch. This will allow him to pursue his sought after changes in military and drug war issues. These are his views that most people like.

On the other hand, the "crazy" policies that most people have issues with such as the fed and the gold standard he will have no power over since he isn't congress. Congress doesn't even have to "block" him, a majority just have neglect to push these agendas, which they will most certainly do.

How is this justification flawed?

Author

Account Strength

100%

Account Age

13 years

Verified Email

Yes

Verified Flair

Total Karma

79,442

Link Karma

9,976

Comment Karma

69,367

Profile updated: 6 days ago

Posts updated: 4 months ago

Natolx

Subreddit

r/politics

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.

Posted: 12 years ago
Reddit URL: View post on reddit.com
External URL: reddit.com/r/politics/co...