Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

6
Is this a bad jam? Trying not to be results oriented
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Playing 1/2 at TCH:S, 8 handed, $300 effective

Hero has pocket queens in CO

UTG 1 opens to 15, UTG 2 calls

Hero 3 bets to 65, UTG 1 (Villain) calls and UTG 2 folds, heads up to the flop

Flop comes 874 rainbow, Villain checks and hero bets 60 (in hindsight I prolly could’ve gone larger here)

Villain check raises to 155, hero jams for rest of his stack (80 on top), villain calls.

At the time I wasn’t sure if this was a bad jam: I can mostly rule out AA and KK since villain didn’t not 4 bet, however there are set combos here that the villain can easily have. At the same time, the check raise could be done as a semi-bluff with T9 with a backdoor flush draw. So basically: I’m losing to sets and 65, but beating JJ, TT, 99, and some combos of semi-bluffs that could’ve played this way.

We chose to run it twice: villain showed 89hh and binked an 8 on the first runout, second runout was clean so we chop.

Author
Account Strength
60%
Account Age
6 years
Verified Email
No
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
2,028
Link Karma
756
Comment Karma
1,222
Profile updated: 4 hours ago
Posts updated: 2 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 months ago