This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
You're right, it's just much less common due to bone density.
It makes sense when the only pokemon able to make fossils are rock types. There are even Pokedex entries stating kabuto/kabutops have been found alive and unchanged for millions of years. They've been rock type the whole time. Reanimating them didn't give them the rock type. Why haven't we been able to find a thousand other types of fossils from different types of pokemon?
Also galar fossils are some of the ugliest (still creative tho) designs in the series.
I can guarantee you they were pokemon before and not just dinosaur, plant, etcetera. Kind of like a Carnivine isn't just a plant but a Pokemon.
Mega Aerodactyl has rocks covering it's body and states that it is similar to its original form when it was covered in sharp rocks.
Wait are you telling me Luxray isn't a real cat? It's pokemon not real life. Although there may be parallels to real life there aren't any regular animals in Pokemon besides the ret conned one from the anime. There are regular plants and trees tho. I'm just not sure which fossil is a plant. Cradily is a barnacle.
Another point of parallels is that birds don't fossilize. So the bird like fossils would almost certainly have to be rock or steel type to maintain form.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 9 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- i.redd.it/u6lcpzn4ze7c1....
Only galar fossils have a non rock type.