Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

9
Okay. This is the end. Thanks you, shit reviewers. You made this experience lackluster.
Post Body

It seems I have been flagged on the platform due to low quality submissions. I was recently on Bee and received a string of wrongful 2/5 ratings or reviews. I am posting a couple here for example.

This is some viciousness. I hope if you're the loser who reviewed my work, you see this and feel like donkey shit. You're either ignorant or way over your head.

  • Task 1

https://preview.redd.it/o5dz3yqo4ygd1.png?width=1112&format=png&auto=webp&s=ea8e66d50e1b53df8e2babddfa6020b1fac73a7c

The first example. This was unfairly marked down. I see why you would mark this down, but it just reeks ignorance. If you knew anything about geography or even many population lists, you would know that the estimates vary from state to state due to several factors, such as how land or surface area is calculated due to things like water area, etc. While the census is the official measure of the state population, there is no indication that we have to use the census as the source of truth. You didn't see the exact order of states that was reflected in the census and decided to be an asshole and mark this down without even looking to see if the states were in relatively close order to the list (for the factors I described). You're scum. I would have never given someone a 2 for this. At least a 3.

  • Task 2

R1

https://preview.redd.it/nkyrxtnf5ygd1.png?width=518&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3b7b8ef60f82b0c78ef5476a32967959c870ac1

R2

https://preview.redd.it/xu34tufi5ygd1.png?width=473&format=png&auto=webp&s=eabd140ee180c95725481ba349043338cd1d8927

Feedback:

https://preview.redd.it/4t1tfmem5ygd1.png?width=1119&format=png&auto=webp&s=956d8b1feffeddf3534890e13777714193991e65

Another one right here. You claimed that one of the responses failed to categorize Paul Gascoigne into its own category. I see it here in both responses or models. Don't you? You might need to get those eyes or glasses checked.

Also, Ohtani and Otani are both okay. Have you ever heard of variations of foreign or cultural names? This is very minor thing that I feel you dinged me so harshly on. Both spelling formats are technically correct.

NOTE: According to project instructions, the bolding and underling or text size of headings isn't supposed to be mentioned in the concision section. It goes into the Overall Satisfaction description. Just thought I'd let you know before you ruin someone's experience soon.

Anyway, peace out! I'm over the lack of transparency and communication from this company. It was nice meeting so many of ya.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
5 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,202
Link Karma
358
Comment Karma
844
Profile updated: 11 hours ago
Posts updated: 2 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 months ago