C9K System MTU differences. Why?

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

Post Body

Can anyone help me understand why Cisco did what they did here?

C9500 (UADP 3.0 ASIC)

C9500-48Y4C(config)#system mtu ?  
  <1500-9216>  MTU size in bytes  
C9500-48Y4C(config)#system mtu

C9400 (UADP 2.0XL ASIC)

C9400-SUP-1XL-Y(config)#system mtu ?  
  <1500-9216>  MTU size in bytes  
C9400-SUP-1XL-Y(config)#system mtu

C9300 (UADP 2.0 ASIC)

C9300-48UXM(config)#system mtu ?  
  <1500-9198>  MTU size in bytes  
C9300-48UXM(config)#system mtu

C9200 (UADP 2.0 mini ASIC)

C9200-48T(config)#system mtu ?  
  <1500-9198>  MTU size in bytes  
C9200-48T(config)#system mtu

Feels like someone is drinking the bong water...

Author

Account Strength

100%

Account Age

10 years

Verified Email

Yes

Verified Flair

Total Karma

391,517

Link Karma

2,049

Comment Karma

370,068

Profile updated: 1 day ago

Posts updated: 5 months ago

VA_Network_Nerd

Moderator | Infrastructure Architect

Subreddit

r/networking

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.

Posted: 10 months ago
Reddit URL: View post on reddit.com
External URL: reddit.com/r/networking/...