Some Precedent along with Thoughts

Cherrylaser v. Imperator is the substantive and most relevant verdict on property law for realms. It is through this that this verdict is interpreted.

I have previously made statements on property law which may prove an insightful or dry read depending on your disposition.

Already failing to adhere to the maxim “brevity is the soul of wit” I shall now delve into the judgement.

On Ownership

“JeffreyIndy hasn't substantiated any of his claims to ownership of this land” was the defendant’s charge, a charge which would have made proceedings invalid to start. I am satisfied, having witnessed JeffreyIndy work on the piece of land alluded to that the land is verifiably his. There is discord proof of this, which if required I will post in an addendum.

This is done in the spirit of the trial, though I must say that the plaintiff should in future show relevant screens of nl ownership.

The Road

I do therefore find naturally then that JeffreyIndy has developed this strip of road. It is ironic that this is an “own goal” by the defence, but I nonetheless appreciate the candidness. Reparation is required therefore. Upon thinking upon the functioning and material value of the road I offer the defendant two options:

1) to reinstate the road as it was before

2) to make a more aesthetically fitting (with the house) thoroughfare and reimburse the difference in terms of stone slabs or reinforcements.

On the Plot

In finding the plaintiff owner of the plot, I am also able to attach a rough dating to the works, correlating with the defence’s testimony. There was such a long period of empty land that indeed it could hardly be construed as actively “de-developed” pending construction, but rather hopeful for third-party development which is suitably tenuous.

The intent of the land- not property- was for it to be developed; it was developed with a beautiful building. It belongs to several such areas, and the plaintiff argued not to the contrary. In no ways is this grief but an appropriate use of the conveniently designated area.

Some General Thoughts

I have given some thought to the intricacies of property law and how in fact groups like the CC may continue to hold legally land as property. Best practice for such may be the development of campsites and other such temporary builds, which in any event would be much more pleasing than claims spikes.

Summary of Actions

• the road is to be restored by the defendant in accordance with stipulation in the verdict.

• the defendant is found innocent of grief.