This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I am hereby presiding.
My potential conflict of interest
Per CMA§III.B, Court Structure, part (iii) subpart (B), I am declaring a potential conflict of interest, in that I was previously appointed City Solicitor by Godomasta during his first term as Mayor, and have voted for Godomasta in both elections.
If either the plaintiff or the defense believe this compromises my impartiality, please petition the other two judges per the constitutional clause above for them to make a ruling on whether I can preside on this case.
For the record, I believe I can be fully impartial in this trial, or I would not have started this thread. However, the law is clear that I must declare all potential conflicts, and so I have.
Order of Trial
a. Prosecution presents claim
b. Defendant enters plea. Pleas will be Guilty, Not Guilty, no-contest.
c. Prosecution presents evidence, and calls witnesses.
d. Defense cross examination.
e. Defendant presents evidence, and calls witnesses.
f. Prosecution cross examination.
g. Prosecution closing statement
h. Defendant closing statement.
After these steps, a verdict will be rendered. For more details, please refer to CMA§III.C, Trials.
Lex Paciferat.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 5 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/mtaugustaju...