Trial: https://www.reddit.com/r/mtaugustajustice/comments/9vzkoo/trial_baes20_vs_gregy165/

The prosecution has given near-zero evidence of anything. The burden of proof is on them to establish a crime, and they did not come anywhere close to meeting it.

The prosecution provided me with a grainy video of some unknown building being filmed by an unknown person (until the defense started pointing out timestamps, I couldn't even figure out that the video mentioned gregy at all. Even then it took like 5 tries. And if they hadn't gone along with it being his alt, I wouldn't have had evidence that gregy even is the same person as cassius either). Large portions of highly relevant chat were covered with some obnoxious movie poster, an obviously relevant yet totally unexplained standoff happened beforehand, with an obviously relevant yet also totally unexplained vault/bunker environment belonging to... somebody? And an initial attack was made by an unidentified individual that goes entirely unmentioned and which is also obviously relevant. With basically no explanation, walkthrough, timeline, context, screenshots, etc. from the prosecution to assist at all. Neither initially, in testimony, nor in conclusion.

You could drive a truck through the potential holes and other explanations and missing info in this story. It fails to meet "clear and convincing evidence" (200.01) of any crime claimed here, and fails to meet "preponderance of the evidence" (600.01).

Any further considerations of fine-grained details and which subtle situation would win over other subtle situations in the law is not useful to me, because I don't have even a gross/broad idea of what actually happened here (as opposed to unsubstantiated anecdotes and hearsay), let alone enough to consider subtleties.

200.01: As azkedar correctly points out, 200.01 is about real estate theft, and has nothing to do with what is even claimed here, let alone whether it's true. So the burden is definitely not met for something that isn't claimed in the first place. Not Guilty.

600.01: Not guilty due to failure to meet burden of evidence.

Thank you