Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details
2
[Verdict] ShadedJon vs camokool
Author Summary
yourfriendmichelle is in VERDICT
Post Body

This case seems to be identical to ShadedJon vs Fancy_Pantsy so I'll keep it simple and just let it be said here, camokool is found not guilty on all charges.

Griefing charge: No armor was destroyed which is required by definition of first degree intentional griefing:

a. Except as provided in subsection 2, the willful destruction of property with the intent to cause destruction


Attempted murder: camokool was part of the group of Channers, some of which were slaughtered, and had the right to defend himself and his kinsmen. I covered this better in the daddo case:

Regardless, all individuals who are in the city of Mount Augusta have the right to self defense, defined by the criminal code as "reasonable force when it appears reasonably necessary to prevent an impending injury." daddo69 was defending himself in response to the attack of his fellow Chanadians who were being easily picked off by the Eden forces. The belief that there was an impending injury is considered reasonable due to the fact that Chanadians were being pearled with little to no evidence against them, as proven by their release ~24 hours later.


In regards to the treason charge:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FjWe31S_0g

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
11 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
6,022
Link Karma
827
Comment Karma
4,687
Profile updated: 1 month ago
Posts updated: 11 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
9 years ago