Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

639
Why is the military interested in geometric representation theory?
Post Body

In 2004, mathematicians Edward Frenkel, Dennis Gaitsgory, Kari Vilonen, and Mark Goresky were awarded millions of dollars in the form of a grant by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). The project being funded was to relate the geometric Langlands program to quantum field theory.

According to DARPA’s Wikipedia page, the agency is “a research and development agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military.” In other words, it seems unlikely that an agency dedicated to researching military technology would fund anything with no chance of being applicable to its goal.

Now anyone who has spent any time trying to understand the mathematics related to the geometric Langlands program knows that it’s a highly abstract field. Although the program has roots in number theory, its central conjectures are certain equivalences of DG categories whose definitions take literal books to write out fully. Even the program’s connections to physics (via S-duality a la Witten) seem too deep to have any real impact on “real world” issues.

My question is as stated in the title. Why is the US military interested in funding research related to highly abstract subfields of math and physics?

Two possibilities spring to mind:

1) DARPA has no understanding of the project; it just knows that it’s a hot topic and hopes that some practical application will come of it in the future

2) There are actual concrete applications the military has in mind but they’re classified.

Any thoughts?

Comments

As somebody who has been through the process of DARPA program conception through launch, observed the whole process as an advisor to a DARPA program manager, and also run my own smaller programs for other branches of DoD I can say with certainty that the process can be highly political. A proposer who spouts incomprehensible nonsense but otherwise has a number of friends on the government side has orders of magnitude higher chances of obtaining funding. The answer to why something was funded could very well be as simple as "the proposer has political influence".

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
5 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
15,895
Link Karma
540
Comment Karma
15,169
Profile updated: 6 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 years ago