Specifically within a Correctional setting, but I imagine most tribunals will be similar.

Inside, there are regulations and rules with specified penalties in the regulation. Let's speak about the Alberta Corrections Regulation specifically:

https://open.alberta.ca/publications/2001_205

So within here, empowered by the Corrections Act, it lays out how Adjudication Court proceeds within the centre. It also explains that the normal thresholds for admitting evidence do not apply. Okay, that's fair.

What I ask, however, is what happens if this is brought before the King's Bench for review, and there is confidential information, or ill-received evidence admitted into the case? If the jail is submitting private health information (or something similar) that they have no right to as evidence, is it going to be disallowed??