This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Hello,
(TL;DR at the bottom):
I recently recorded a musical track with an old band mate of mine for her new musical project/solo release. The track is one that I wrote some time ago, and she contributed later. Our band performed this track and even recorded a demo of it. Long story short, she asked me to be a part of the track insofar as updating the structure and quality, etc...and then I would be recording most of the rhythm tracks and most of the lead track (with her producer filling in the other parts) The song will be published by their publishing imprint. I am good with all this, just wanted to provide background information. My question/concern is as follows:
I know that I need and am using a Single Song Agreement. I am only involved in *this* song, they have others they have released and plan to still release. I am not involved in those songs or their current musical endeavor. I have a Single Song Agreement (template) that I have filled out and the thought crossed my mind: Do I need one Single Song Agreement as a Writer and one as a Performer, or does just *one* agreement cover *both* capacities.
In case any of you are kind enough to and/or are able to respond but would have to provide a broad answer or an answer based on where you are, I am in the Los Angeles, California area. If that would help clear up any confusion.
Thank you all so much in advance for taking the time to read this. I look forward to any/all responses I may receive.
TL;DR: Co-Wrote and recorded a music track. Should I be using one or two single song agreements (one for writer, one for performer) or does just one cover them both? I'm located around Los Angeles, California.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 4 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/legaladvice...