Employer says they won’t pay meal violations if unable to take a lunch

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

Post Body

Newer employee of this company that says if I’m unable to take a lunch due to workload, they won’t pay the meal violation. They will only pay for time worked. My direct manager has been adding 30min (the lunch break) to the end of my shift to make up for the missed lunch, because I actually worked for that 30min break. Then adding a lunch break to my time card. Is this legal? I know from being a manager in retail that this is a big no no and they paid a meal break penalty if you were unable to take a lunch. (Oregon)

TLDR- company says if I don’t take a lunch they will add the worked lunch time to the end of my shift.

Author

Account Strength

60%

Account Age

2 years

Verified Email

Yes

Verified Flair

Total Karma

1,098

Link Karma

Comment Karma

1,075

Profile updated: 4 days ago

Posts updated: 3 weeks ago

nikki12955

Subreddit

r/legaladvice

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.

Posted: 1 year ago
Reddit URL: View post on reddit.com
External URL: reddit.com/r/legaladvice...