I don't mean to get too far into the weeds of romance, relationships, and love, but I noticed something logically inconsistent. I remember reading that babies that don't get any touch in orphanages tend to die. Now I am no expert, but it seems like touch/relationships are important. People say love/sex/romance are optional, but even on Maslows hierarchy a sense of belonging/love is very important (not saying it has to be romantic, but I digress).So setting that up, people say people don't need sex or romantic relationships. Very fine and well and that is their opinion, but then again people need food, water, shelter, etc. and people lobby for government subsidies for these things and that it is a right. If that is the case, then why isn't love a human right? It just is funny people can be very Darwinian on one hand (no one owes you anything), but then on the other hand rattle off a ton of stuff that should not be Darwinian. I am of the opinion no one owes your anything, but I just find it funny. Hell, even FDR in his new Bill of Rights stated that there is a right to entertainment! Denmark even pays for prostitution for the disabled. I am not in favor of those things, but I hate logical inconstancy.