you lack a remarkable amount of reading comprehension

i think you are too stuck in your own opinion to understand what I'm trying to say here and that's fine but I literally could not be clearer so i am finished with this conversation adieu and farewell

You realize one of those diets causes significantly less suffering right?

sure you didnt. it's just blatantly untrue, there's no such thing as a moral diet and it's a dumb thing to argue about because at the end of the day it Does Not matter

if i keep a few chickens and a cow in good conditions in my backyard and get milk and eggs from them and then have them slaughtered and eat them that's better than someone eating a vegan diet of imported food grown by workers in horrible conditions

if you eat a vegan diet of homegrown food that you make or buy from local markets that's better than eating eggs from chickens which were battery farmed

its not about the food

throwing around buzzwords doesnt make you right

you look me in the eyes and tell me you're equating human suffering and animal suffering

'oh yeah a couple of children being forced to spend long hours harvesting food so i can feel good about not eating meat plus all the pollution created by importing it is better than animals being slaughtered for food because there are less children. i am very smart' ~you

no

make an effort to make sure your food is as cruelty-free as possible. your child slave quinoa is no better than battery-farmed eggs. there's no point arguing back and forth about what diet is morally correct when the answer is no diet is inherently better than any other. just do what you can do to reduce harm