Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

6
Does it help to consider other animals or plants?
Post Body

I do not believe free will exists, but I find that people really have a mental resistance to even engaging in the topic. Would it be easier for them to consider in the context of other animals?

If you are a free will believer, do you believe your cat has free will? Your dog? Your hamster? Your goldfish? Your fern? Once you tell us where you draw the line, then we can dig a little deeper and see what you think makes free will exist over here in humans, but not over there in your house pet. What biological difference is there? Is there a free will gene?

I was thinking about this today when my elderly cat put her claw in my leg as she stretched this morning. My reaction was not to yell at her and call her a bad cat. It was to gently and lovingly remove the claw from my leg. Because I know that she is not capable of making a meaningful choice - her body was stretching, my leg was there, she probably could not even see it. It's just her biology making her act the way she does. No reason for anger, resentment, etc at her.

And then I thought about the concepts of "all dogs go to heaven" and "putting down a rabid dog." No one (neurotypical) likes the idea of killing a rabid dog - we just accept that is something we have to do as a safety precaution. This is very close to my views on criminal justice without free will.

Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

I think that's about right, haven't read him in a while though. I remember liking his stuff on consciousness.

[not loaded or deleted]

I guess... I mean, it's more eloquently said and better developed than that, but I think he would say many brain defects disqualify people out of free will. I enjoyed the book but I think he still missed the point.

Some compatibilists (Dennett I think, if I remember correctly from "freedom evolves") think that language is necessary. He says something like evolutional "R&D" put us in a place where we can *take* responsibility. In that case, animals without complex languages that allow self reflection would be denied free will I guess.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
13,945
Link Karma
637
Comment Karma
12,890
Profile updated: 1 week ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago