This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I benched him and I still think it was the right call
Going from IR to playing that quick is definitely cause for concern
Sucks that the points were on my bench but I’d rather that and see the proof he’s back than to hope and pray and maybe end up with a bad result
I’m in a much better spot so I could afford to bench him
He was going to be my flex (Lamb and Nabers starting) but I’ve got Kareem Hunt against the raiders so I’m happy
It wouldn’t bug me a bit if Puka only got 25% of the snaps, put up 100yrds a game and were a-okay with that
No one expected the Rams to run 71 snaps which I think os where part of the betting odds came from
On 40/71 that’s a 56% participation rate which is pretty low for a star WR
Still crazy he had a 100yrd game while missing out on almost half the snaps
Knock on wood I’m 1st in the league with a solid roster without Puka, if I wasn’t stacked the way I am I absolutely would’ve started him
Obviously can’t fault anyone for starting him when he shows up like that though
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 month ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- theramswire.usatoday.com...
He didn’t get a lot of snaps which is crazy
I believe he ended up with a 53% snap participation