Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

56
I think they nerfed Siam too hard
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

One of the patchnotes 1.35 had was that they nerfed Siam because they were too powerful? I guess the 1 Cav fire and 30% manpower were a bit too powerful, but other than that Siamese Ideas were well-rounded.

I dont think its justified knowing how they repealed European advances well-enough into the 20th Century when everyone around them were being conquered, but even then, during the early modern period, Ayuthayya/Siam was able to repeal a Spanish-backed attempt to takeover Cambodia (mind you it was during the time of the rise of Tercios) and likewise they were able to repel several British and Portuguese incursions that would've otherwise added them to humungous trade empires.

Maybe at least give Siam that 10% Artillery Combat Ability or give them 10% Land Fire Damage, if they give Smolenks unreasonable national ideas, maybe give Southeast Asian tags a chance to shine, especially Ayutthaya/Siam who has been known to go against European powers. What do you guys think?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
15,720
Link Karma
6,122
Comment Karma
9,497
Profile updated: 1 day ago
Posts updated: 9 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago