Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

4
Confusing remark about some evidence in Case 3-3?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I know, I know, Case 3-3 is already wacky nonsense. But I've been looking around and haven't found anything about this particular detail. A friend of mine was playing through it recently and pointed out these lines of dialog:

https://i.imgur.com/8vaH8Af.png

This blood is dry...

It must have been spilled a few hours before Angie was killed. Maybe more.

That fits the 2 a.m. time of death listed in the Monokuma File.

They were in reference to this pool of blood from the first victim's neck. Was this a mistake in translation or writing? Was it supposed to be "found" instead of "killed"? Are we missing something here? Or is that really just saying that she died a few hours after being stabbed in the neck?

She did have a head wound that she received some amount of time before being killed by the neck wound, but it probably wasn't "a few hours" and Shuichi specifically says "This can't be from her forehead. This blood is from the back of her neck."

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
114,536
Link Karma
14,524
Comment Karma
100,004
Profile updated: 1 day ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 years ago