Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
Reopening the Peralez debate
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I want to talk about the quest Dream On and the decision of telling Jeff Peralez the truth or not. Thanks to phantom liberty, we get an idea into the larger outcomes of this decision. I think at this point it is more than obvious that Mr. Blue Eyes and who is behind the mind-control scheme is a rogue AI (even if you don’t agree for this discussion let’s just assume this is true).

Now, not telling him the truth results in him continuing to be manipulated by this AI and results in a mayoral policies that fuck over the corporations but this also means wearing NetWatch for obviously nefarious purposes. However, we all pretty much hate corpos, right? So this seems like it would be an okay option and Johnny should agree but doesn’t.

Telling him the truth makes him a paranoid train wreck but ultimately is able to make his own decisions. Unfortunately, this results or more pro-corporate policies which we all do not like the idea of, right?

So do we fight against the rogue AI while unintentionally siding with the corps or fight the corps but unintentionally side with the rogue AI?

Image
Author
Account Strength
60%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,311
Link Karma
708
Comment Karma
603
Profile updated: 6 days ago
Posts updated: 3 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 months ago