Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
Speculating on an individual photon having enough energy to create another big-bang relative to dimensions smaller than the "planck" scale
Post Body

If it's known that the planck lenght represents a very "small" dimension where the laws of physics cease to operate (although we cannot know what happens to reality on such small dimension), there must exist an equivalent point where the observable universe will expand into such a big spatial scale that the laws of physics also cease to operate.

And a recent study about the potential lifetime of photons showed that light particles can last a billion of a billion years.

So my question is this: assuming that a single photon will have a "lot" of time to reach a point where the universe spatial expansion causes the laws of physics to "end" in a way that could be similar to what happens at dimensions "smaller" than the planck length, can we speculate that a "single" photon of "our" observable universe may carry enough energy to generate another big bang relative to dimensions that are much "smaller" than the planck length ????

I ask this question because I cannot believe that there is a scale "limit" on how small or big reality can be, and I just recognize that the laws of physics cannot apply on the very big or very small scales, so it's absolutly natural to imagine that a tiny ammount of energy in "our" observable universe could be a "colossal" ammount of energy for scales that are much smaller than the planck lenght.

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,071
Link Karma
967
Comment Karma
84
Profile updated: 6 days ago
Posts updated: 1 year ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 years ago