This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Does anyone else feel like ATPH is the stronger book? I feel like it's narrative is so much tighter and vivid. I do appreciate parts of The Crossing's dialogue:, the wolf, the old priest, the blind woman, but I feel like these profound philosophical moments are spread out between aimless wandering and eating tortillas. It was honestly a bit of a slog to get through whereas ATPH seemed to hit on a lot of the same philosophical notes but tied together in a much more interesting way. I feel like I grasp the themes and philosophy, but am I missing something else?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 2 weeks ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/cormacmccar...