Was watching Billy Carson, and he mentioned that the Annunaki had encoded human DNA with the "worship gene", all "scientifically proven".

I don't know about that. But lately I wonder a lot about what makes people defend their world view so desperately when confronted with an alternative viewpoint. Online conversations turn downright nasty if you mention that the RNA jabs actually caused a lot of adverse reactions and that people have even died. Or if you point out that greenhouse gases mean more vegetation, or that the planet warms and cools in regular cycles, and is currently warming because we are coming out an ice age.

The other day I posted a comment on Islamic history. Dude comes back and says " I dont engage with people who post on r/conspiracy" or something like that, and deletes the entire thread.

I'm curious by nature. Also skeptical, and distrustful of authority, especially the state, including media, acedemia, entertainment, and religion. My main studies are history and philosophy, especially philosophy of science. I've also studied both formal and informal logic - so I have a fair idea when I'm being lied to/manipulated/gaslit.

What gets me tho is the people who feel the need to point and laugh at 'conspiracy theorists', who are oftentimes turn out to be right.

Is it just tribalism? Or did the Annunaki splice in the Hall Monitor gene when creating humans to be their slaves?