This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
There seems to be a lot of hate for end-of-session burnout climbing on climbing subs and I want to know the reason behind this.
Many people seem to favor training fresh so that they can climb harder and send more, but is this leading to more improvement? I used to run a lot and most coaches opted to increase mileage until we were close to burnout and then decrease mileage for end-of-season racing. Time and time again this worked wonders for our team. So my question is, should climbers follow a similar routine if they want to see max improvement?
I climb every other day and recently took 4 days off and came back projecting 2 V grades higher than usual. Am I exhausting myself, or is this strategic? I fear that I wouldn’t see the same results without training as hard as I do.
I currently limit bouldering one session, rest a day, sport climb the next session with 30 minutes ARC at the end, rest a day, then repeat. I also do abs stretch daily and a hip mobility workout on off days.
I was considering adding a 4x4 at the end of my limit sessions but I want to know if that would be advantageous.
If limit bouldering is power lifting, and sport climbing/ARC/4x4 is running, a healthy balance of both seems like the best idea, right?
What do you think, how much is too much, and what does “too much” look like?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 year ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/climbharder...