This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I know a lot of games get a lot of flack by just kind of mass disliking them these days for things that aren't actually representative of gameplay - like Battlefield V getting poor reviews because of female soldiers and that kinda stuff. But, I'm seeing a lot of reviews for Civ VI that are warning against it due to bad AI. Out of curiosity, are these things true? Namely, does the AI cheat rather than actually play the game strategically? Do you get locked into a spiral of recursive warmongering, like being attacked by someone for having too small of an army because they dislike that about you, and then you get hit with penalties because you actually went on the offensive after you got attacked, which leads everyone to hating you? I'm cautious to buy in with all the mixed reviews I'm seeing, but I had a lot of fun with Civ V, personally, at least after I modded out the cheating AI.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 5 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/civ/comment...