Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
The most annoying insult to this beautiful game.
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I’m sorry to rant but I’m gonna say it. Perpetually checking your opponent is the absolute most vulgar and unsportsmanlike thing you could ever do in this game. You are basically declaring at that point “I cannot think of a way to win so I’m gonna annoy you into either blundering or until I fell like it. Sure you CAN do it but IMHO it’s for sore losers and people who can’t win through strategy TLDR: perpetual check = u suck at chess

Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

At this point you’re just yapping about opponents who refuse to just let you win when you haven’t been good enough to win, calling them all sorts of names that probably apply to yourself if you look in the mirror.

Try to learn what you’re even talking about first before opening your mouth.

Perpetual check is a sequence of checking moves that can neither be escaped from nor won by the one checking. It’s a draw by repetition (as with any other type of repetition, not just through checking moves).

Being on the receiving end of perpetual check and a forced draw means YOU’ve failed to convert your winning advantage by not covering your back and allowing it to happen. It’s not an annoyance but a completely valid strategy. Converting a losing position into a draw is not ”unsportsmanlike”, but rather one could argue it’s a very core principle of chess.

”Many checks” however is not synonymous with perpetual check, at all.

[not loaded or deleted]

It sounds like you’re low elo, which is not necessarily an accurate representation of your skill, however it is an accurate representation of the type of blunders one may generally expect an opponent in that rating bracket to make.

Hence, ”not accepting that you’ve lost” does not really apply at certain levels because the opponent may surprise you with any type of blunder. If you find yourself in a losing position against a 300 rated player and have any clue what you’re doing, it would be simply dumb to not see it out. If you had a higher ranking this wouldn’t happen. But you’re losing your cool and going on a crusade about it.

Author
Account Strength
Pending
Account Age
n/a
Verified Email
No
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
n/a
Link Karma
n/a
Comment Karma
n/a
Profile update pending..

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 days ago