I believe both sides are wrong in several ways and that a middle ground between them is the most moral and logical choice.

Pro-life is flawed because in early pregnancies the fetus is in fact just a clump of cells and destroying it trough abortion is no different than simply cutting off a piece of your living body. And it can usually be done with just some medicine instead of any medical procedures. And a woman should be allowed this choice considering whats in her body cannot yet be considered a person.

Pro-abortion is flawed because later stage abortions are quite horrific.(20 weeks ) Where the premature but fully formed baby is either torn limb from limb and mushed into a pine paste before being sucked out. Or simply forced out trough induced labour and left to die, alone and cold without ever feeling the warmth of being held. This is made especially horrific at weeks 24-30. Where 24 weeks old babies have a 2/3 chance of surviving and 30 weeks having 98% chance of surviving trough premature birth.

The late stage abortions are not as bad if the mother would die with their child if they arent done. But that should be detectable before it reaches such a late stage of gestation.

So as you probably figured out from my earlier words. I believe that women should be able to abort early. And that it should be illegal to abort at pregnancies above 20 weeks unless both the mother and child or just the child would die anyway if it was not done. I believe this is the most logical view of abortion.

This is my view and im seeing if there is any holes in it which is why im posting it here.