Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

1,617
CMV: The move to a 4 day, 32 hour work week is dangerous to worker's income IF it is passed before, or without, worker's rights and wage protection legislation that is specifically made for the change in hours.
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Edit: this is in regards to California Rep. Mark Takano's bill, in the US.

I had a nice, big writeup and realized I can just iterate my worry more succinctly:

Businesses that can, will, use this to save costs.

Stan McBusinessowner says, "All of the product, possibly more, we're used to creating can be generated in 80% of the time? Oh, cool, that's a 20% reduction in labor cost!" While Kelly Employee loses 20% of her paycheck.

Are the industries where this cannot happen greater than I can imagine? Would, perhaps, the effects on the job market create an effect where wages grow to compensate and I just don't see it? Are there workers protections wrapped into this legislation? Chances of a bill like this passing are probably low, are we probably just going to see conversation and evolution and not this change immediately?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
13 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
20,025
Link Karma
2,556
Comment Karma
17,429
Profile updated: 5 days ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago