This is a very interesting idea and I have been reading all the posts. But many of them have been citing the fact that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. While this is true, and I get the criticism about the EC (how 1 vote in Cali is worth 2 in WV), and all, but those weren't the rules of the game. I have no idea what the outcome would have been if it was a straight up popular vote. Sure, more people in California and New York would have voted due to the fact that their vote actually counted, but couldn't you say the same about Texas and every state that voted Republican? Not trying to start anything at all, I am just curious about that logic.