Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Limit Law Sum Proof - Confusing = Confusing so LS= RS
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Hi, first year calculus, first written assignment.
I think I answered part A with adeqant proof: explain how product of two limits can exsist when f(x) or g(x) does not exist. I demonstrated how combining the two eqations is the same as evaluating lim of 0) = lim of 0-.

I understand delta epsilon but I lose understanding at the f(x) g(x) - L - M delta epsilon bifurcation, and even then it doesnt explain how NAN 0 = a Real number.

I chose to go withf(x) = sqrt(x)g(x) = - sqrt ( - x)assuming lim [ x >> 0 ][ f(x) g(x) ] = 0, am I wrong or did I mess up somewhere?

https://preview.redd.it/rj0zexhhroq91.png?width=1656&format=png&auto=webp&s=bc1667e0f87fa2160d7461ccea71ae07943954f8

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
3,731
Link Karma
2,324
Comment Karma
1,389
Profile updated: 5 days ago
Posts updated: 1 month ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 years ago