Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details
70
Now that we know that BitFury is almost certainly malicious and BTCC might be so, it's clear why the other side has been calling for "90% consensus" instead of 75%.
Author Summary
imaginary_username is in Mali
Post Body

https://blockchain.info/pools

For the past four days, BitFury BTCC has been 29%. An activation condition of 75% ensures that we'll never fork with a minority... but can still overcome, just by random chance over a long enough time, obstruction in the form of 26%~30%. However...

If we took the trolls seriously and actually activates at 90%, a single malicious actor (BitFury) can block the fork for a long time, and almost indefinitely with a helper. Keep in mind that BitFury is not a pool, it's a completely centralized mining outfit that has zero worry about losing miners. A single guy who's doing insider trading at this company can wreck any hopes for Bitcoin to move forward.

Of course, ideally, we should have a less centralized mining scene and this won't be an issue, but this is what we got here.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
55,982
Link Karma
7,602
Comment Karma
47,956
Profile updated: 6 days ago
Posts updated: 7 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
8 years ago