Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
I challenge hawking radiation
Post Body

Title: Reevaluating the Impact of Hawking Radiation on Black Hole Evolution

Abstract:

This paper challenges the conventional interpretation of Hawking radiation as a mechanism leading to the inevitable evaporation of black holes. Instead, I propose a perspective that views Hawking radiation as evidence of a perpetual and dynamic process, allowing black holes to undergo indefinite cycles of gaining and losing mass. This viewpoint is rooted in the inherent randomness of particle creation near a black hole and questions the assumption of a continuous decrease in black hole size.

Introduction:

Hawking radiation, a quantum phenomenon predicted to occur near black holes, has been traditionally associated with the gradual evaporation of these cosmic entities. However, this paper aims to present an alternative interpretation—one that sees Hawking radiation as indicative of a perpetual oscillation in a black hole's mass.

Key Points:

Random Nature of Particle Creation: The randomness in the creation of particle-antiparticle pairs near a black hole challenges the notion of a consistent and irreversible decrease in mass due to Hawking radiation. Dual Impact of Particle Interaction: Acknowledging that both positive and negative energy particles can be involved in the Hawking process, the argument suggests that the net effect on a black hole's mass may not be strictly decreasing. Perpetual Functionality: The proposed perspective suggests that, given the inherent unpredictability of quantum fluctuations, black holes could perpetually experience cycles of gaining and losing mass. Supporting Evidence:

The argument draws upon existing observations of Hawking radiation, emphasizing instances where positive energy particles contribute to the black hole's mass rather than diminishing it. Additionally, it discusses the limitations and uncertainties in the current understanding of black hole dynamics.

Conclusion:

In reconsidering the implications of Hawking radiation, this paper offers an alternative viewpoint that challenges the prevailing narrative of black hole evaporation. By recognizing the dynamic and probabilistic nature of the processes involved, we open avenues for further exploration and refinement of our understanding of black hole physics.

Acknowledgments:

The author acknowledges the complexities of black hole physics, the contributions of researchers in the field, and the ongoing quest for a unified theory of quantum gravity.

Feel free to modify this draft according to your preferences and additional insights.

Author
User Disabled
Account Strength
0%
Disabled 6 months ago
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
242
Link Karma
225
Comment Karma
17
Profile updated: 9 hours ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago