This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Iām looking for advice on whether Gracie Combatives or traditional Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) would be better for our son, whoās currently two, very active, and intelligent, without any special needs challenges. Weāre considering starting him in Gracieās āMat Munchkinsā program for ages 3-5, which introduces basic self-defense and confidence-building. Eventually, heād move into the āLittle Champsā class (ages 5-7), then āJunior Grapplersā (ages 7-12), which focuses on non-violent techniques for handling bullies, and finally transition into Gracie Combatives, the adult beginner program.
This is the video that made me question the right path. I donāt ever see anything like this at our school.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBMhbDBybK3/?igsh=bDJrZml5dGhoYTl5
Our older son, who has autism and moves a bit slower, began with Junior Grapplers at 12 and transitioned to adult classes at 13. The structured, technique-focused pace of Gracie Combatives has been ideal for him. I have experience with Army combatives, so Iām familiar with the techniques and train with him.
For our younger son who is neurotypical, Iām wondering if he might benefit more from traditional BJJ path, where as he gets older classes are faster-paced with sparring and rolling like in the video link or if Gracieās Combatives structured approach would better suit him long-term. Iād love to hear from anyone with experience in both on whether the Gracie Combatives progression provides enough technical depth or if traditional BJJ might be more beneficial for skill development in a competitive setting. Thanks for any insights!
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 2 weeks ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/bjj/comment...