This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Our lab is working on improving our RNAseq pipeline, specifically when it comes to filtering out low-quality genes. We are currently using a global RPM cutoff. All members of any 1 biological group within an experiment must meet that threshold or the gene is filtered out. We are worried that no matter what we do, this almost always removes smaller genes because they intrinsically have a lower number of reads. We'll continue to pro-con in our lab for the foreseeable future, but I want to know how other researchers are accommodating this conundrum of "What defines a useless gene in our analysis?"
I think I've conveyed everything to cover rule 2.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 2 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/bioinformat...