Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Standards for Comparing ChIP-seq and RNA-seq Data
Post Body

Hi, everyone!

Sorry for all the questions. I try my best to search for the answers myself, but a lot of threads I find aren't very up-to-date. This is a follow-up question to something I posted a few days ago here.

My question this time is mostly related to industry best practices when it comes to ChIP-seq and RNA-seq count normalization. Let's say you're comparing data from two different studies but you're re-processing all the raw data from scratch to avoid any differences stemming from data treatment.

I was thinking the process would go something like: mapping --> normalizing against input --> comparison through a PCA

So my questions are:

  1. What is the current industry standard for normalizing sequencing depth?
  2. Which tools do you use for normalizing against input? Or do most people only do that once it's time to start peak calling?

Thank you! Here's a picture of a sea otter striking a power pose as thanks for reading through my post!

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
8,433
Link Karma
144
Comment Karma
8,289
Profile updated: 8 hours ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago
BSc | Student

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 years ago