So obviously i’m not a lawyer and im not an expert at all on legal matters. But Ive been following this case closely. I decided to compare the case evidence to a case where someone WAS found liable to sexual assault. Trump vs carroll.

So first thing, this is a federal civil suit so unless bassnectar agrees otherwise the jury decision needs to be unanimous. I cannot imagine him wanting anything else.

Next, when a judge responds to a motion for summary judgement, it is her job to be slightly biased towards the non-moving party(plaintiffs). Also all she needed to find is a relevant dispute on a material fact. A material fact is one where if true, the jury would reasonably find them liable. She’s allowed to find a “dispute” based on testimony alone and she’s allowed to believe heresay without considering credibility and corroborating evidence.

So the bar is pretty low. And yet still, she dismissed all charges that had to do with “force” or “coercion”

So i’m just going to take one example. One plaintiff alleges that 20 days before her birthday she and bassnectar had sex. She never told any friend this at the time(even the one driving her). She initially lied to bassnectar about her age. She also told her friend the cash was for “travel and emergencies” not sex. Bassnectar claims he did not have sex that day even though she tried to pursue him and told her why would he do that when they are hanging out after her birthday which is soon. Reasonable, imo especially considering the pattern of misrepresentations from the plaintiffs and contradicting testimony. Bassnectars testimony has been relatively consistent and not retroactively framed.

Also there is zero actual evidence of CSAM proven to be transmitted or received by bassnectar. One plaintiff claimed this happened 20 different times. But digital experts could only find 8 pictures from one day of her underage and again there is zero proof she sent them to anyone. But, the judge has to let a jury decide because of the plaintiffs claiming it’s true. While a jury will be able to check if there is a “preponderance of evidence” and will also be allowed to judge by credibility.

Compared to the Trump case, TRUMP was the one caught in deception lying about ever meeting her. Carroll had multiple witnesses she told about the unfortunate abuse that happened to her.

I personally cannot see any way that a jury will find bassnectar liable for damages on any charge. There simply is way too much room to believe bassnectar may not be lying and there’s simply too many instances of the plaintiffs being caught lying.

Even if 8/10 people on the jury are swayed by emotion and they believe all women movement. All it takes is one juror who doesn’t see nearly enough evidence to hold his moral ground and not vote, which could cause a hung jury and mistrial.

I could be wrong, but I think the jury trial will end overwhelmingly in bassnectars favor although it may be a long deliberation. Feel free to correct me if I’m misunderstanding any part of this process or if there’s evidence I am missing.